Torture banned by geneva conventions prisoners of war should be treated humanely, not as animals the geneva conventions were designed to prevent mistreatment in a time of war. It is the position of the united states government that the legal memoranda constituted only permissible legal research, and did not signify the intent of the united states to use torture, which it opposes secretary of defense donald rumsfeld has complained about this prominent newspaper coverage and its implications. After the september 11, 2001 attacks on the united states, the us government authorized the use of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” on terrorism suspects in us custody.
A nonpartisan review concluded that the use of torture had “damaged the standing” of the united states and “potentially increased the danger to us military personnel. The constitution is the charter for the federal government it “applies” wherever the federal government operates — inside the usa, at sea, on foreign lands, or on the moon it applies to the every branch, every bureaucracy — including the armed forces it is equally valid and important during both peacetime and war.
Is torture acceptable in national security issues 55% say yes 45% say no yes, torture is acceptable in national security issues torture banned by geneva conventions prisoners of war should be treated humanely, not as animals the geneva conventions were designed to prevent mistreatment in a time of war. Even if the government is trying to find out important information, they should use different tactics and methods in order to find that information out torture is out of the question posted by: taihenraion.
Torture and the united states includes documented and alleged cases of torture both inside and outside the united states by members of the us government, the us military, us law enforcement agencies, us intelligence agencies, us health care services, and other us public organizations. Torture is illegal under the geneva conventions, the un convention against torture, the us constitution and the us army field manual redefining it (as the bush lawyers have tried to do) does not make torture legal. News organizations have wrestled with whether to label the brutal methods unequivocally as torture in the face of some government officials’ claims that they were not in addition, the united states is a signatory to the international convention against torture, which requires the prompt investigation of allegations of torture and the compensation of its victims.
Torture and the united states jump to torture in all forms is banned by the 1948 universal declaration of human rights a report by brazil's national truth commission asserted that the united states government was involved in teaching torture techniques to the brazilian military government of 1964-85. During his state of the union address, president bush spoke about the horrifying torture techniques saddam hussein has inflicted on prisoners in iraq he described the use of electric shock.
In the aftermath of the release of a study on the cia's use of torture in interrogation, daniel benjamin argues that the damage done was not just to the public discourse, but also served to weaken the us' long-term counterterrorism efforts and, by extension, national security. Torture must be banned by law unconditionally not all torture decisions should be morally codified the first two principles reject torture on moral grounds (it's wrong) and legal ones (it's bad.
After the september 11, 2001 attacks on the united states, the us government authorized the use of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” on terrorism suspects in us custody for years. International human rights law - as well as us law - do not contain any exceptions to the prohibition against torture there are practical as well as moral reasons for not permitting a ticking bomb -or terrorist attack -- exception to the ban on torture.